Specialized,
not prompted.
Not one generic model stretched thin. NukeAI is four purpose-built engines — each trained for a single job: writing Pine, coding MetaTrader EAs, reading your chart, or thinking through a quick idea.
Nuke AI — Pine Script Dev
Architects and validates TradingView® Pine Script® v6 — indicators and strategies, paste-ready and proven to compile before you ever see them.
Nuke AI — MT4 / MT5
Builds Expert Advisors and custom indicators in MQL4 / MQL5 for MetaTrader, with correct event handlers, magic numbers, and risk controls.
Nuke AI Vision
Reads a chart screenshot and returns market structure, key levels, and a concrete trade idea — its reasoning grounded in what it actually sees.
Nuke AI mini
A fast, lightweight model for everyday trading questions, quick ideas, and back-and-forth — always on, always ready when you just need an answer.
From Idea to Evidence.
The old loop was fragmented — build in one tool, restructure the code by hand, test somewhere else. On NukeAlgo it’s one window: describe, chart, backtest, refine — then save, and the next refinement picks up exactly where this one ended.
Not another chatbot.
The NukeAlgo
Intelligence Difference.
Generic LLMs hallucinate Pine. Nuke AI is trained on the full surface of TradingView®, reads your chart, validates every line it writes, and refuses to ship code it can't prove compiles.
Fluent in Pine Script® v6
Every token, every function, every series type. Nuke AI thinks in Pine — not in JavaScript pretending to be Pine.
Market-aware reasoning
Trained on the concepts traders actually use — SMC, ICT, order flow, Wyckoff — mapped to concrete, executable conditions.
Validates before it ships
Every indicator is compiled, runtime-checked, and benchmarked in-loop. If it fails, Nuke AI rewrites. You never see broken code.
State of the art agent for Pine Script®
Nuke AI is the best available option compared to the best chatbots available on the market for creating indicators and strategies you can plug in to your TradingView® charts.
Pass Rate
Percentage of correct implementations out of 100 total indicators
Specialized Trading Model
Extended Thinking
Thinking
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
All 100 indicators varied in complexity. An implementation is considered failed if it contains errors (syntax or runtime), return NaN or constant unexpected values, or if the AI did not comply with the user request due to infeasability. Benchmark updated on 03/06/2026.


